{"ok":true,"nota":{"id":"1e09755815d1605e","slug":"un-metodo-nuevo-para-fechar-ceramicas-antiguas-se-basa-en-microestruct-1e0975","titulo":"Un método nuevo para fechar cerámicas antiguas se basa en microestructuras visibles a simple vista","resumen":"Los autores proponen un marco teórico que reúne en un solo esquema las microestructuras de la superficie de la cerámica observables entre 40 y 200 aumentos, buscando reemplazar la datación basada solo en la forma y en la experiencia del experto. El trabajo es un capítulo inicial y plantea una hipótesis central que todavía debe ponerse a prueba.","fuente":"zenodo","fuenteNombre":"Zenodo · Investigación abierta","color":"#1682d4","autor":"Liu, Wuling","url":"https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23150130","imagen":"/hoy/portada/1e09755815d1605e","tema":"ciencia","subtemas":["arqueologia","datacion de ceramica","microestructuras","patrimonio cultural","metodos analiticos"],"entidades":["Ceramic Chronostructure"],"formato":"dato","entretenimiento":false,"pubTs":"2026-10-24T04:32:13.000Z","indexTs":"2026-10-26T14:15:23.951Z","hash":"db2c8a7140b4389b80254814a2a4f45bb6d345d74c8f36505445fde84d9fb929","tsa":{"time":"Oct 26 14:16:40 2026 GMT","provider":"freetsa.org","sobre":"sello"},"stats":{"views":0,"likes":0,"clicks":0,"dwell":0},"tipo":"normal","registro":"hallazgo","porQueImporta":"Hoy fechar una pieza de cerámica depende mucho del ojo de quien la mira, y los métodos de laboratorio tienen límites propios. Si la hipótesis se confirma, museos y arqueólogos tendrían un criterio más medible y repetible para saber de qué época es un objeto. Para alguien de acá, eso puede significar que una pieza familiar o hallada en una excavación tenga una fecha más confiable. Todavía es una propuesta sin validar.","quienFirma":"Zenodo · Investigación abierta","confianza":"preprint","consulta":null},"sello":{"hash":"db2c8a7140b4389b80254814a2a4f45bb6d345d74c8f36505445fde84d9fb929","sello":"c9e0a5699906a6006d3764b6f3666f41ed156f9876c9957bfd7c8f9c5e11b266","beacon":{"drand":{"cadena":"8990e7a9aaed2ffed73dbd7092123d6f289930540d7651336225dc172e51b2ce","ronda":6586438,"aleatorio":"4f294943c4dd3c10b1e24f7c56545875a0a612688d26a012314248e6d77f3b8a","tiempo":"2026-10-26T14:16:00.000Z"},"nist":{"cadena":2,"pulso":2000412,"salida":"C2419922DC98A3F87F7E26FEDF3D8D702968696059DB8EB9EEBB16C29D6E3E252C7C7913D7A7C8D2519E64F598ADE3A3134A0C4967FCD869639363722BBD3639","tiempo":"2026-10-26T14:15:00.000Z"},"noAntes":"2026-10-26T14:16:00.000Z"},"verificacion":{"drand":true,"nist":true},"tsa":{"time":"Oct 26 14:16:40 2026 GMT","provider":"freetsa.org","sobre":"sello"},"original":{"titulo":"Ceramic Chronostructure — Chapter One (2.0)(《瓷器时间结构学》—第一章(2.0))","descripcion":"<p>Traditional dating of early ceramics rests on form and surface appearance, and therefore on accumulated experience rather than a unified, quantifiable physical account; standardised and reproducible systems have been hard to achieve. Scientific methods have brought progress but each has limits: thermoluminescence is disturbed by burial radiation, sampling position and artificial irradiation; Raman and trace-element analysis characterise static composition and phase structure rather than the dynamic structural evolution of a surface over long time. None has brought the many repeatable microstructures visible to the eye and between 40x and 200x into a single theoretical frame. Addressing this gap between connoisseurial dating and instrumental testing, this first chapter proposes a core hypothesis: setting aside deliberate damage, strong acid or alkali attack and extreme environments, th","pubDate":"2026-10-24T04:32:13Z","url":"https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23150130"},"indexado":"2026-10-26T14:15:23.951Z"}}